• About Me
  • Media Mentions
  • Contact

Social Metrics

Social Media, Organizations, and Academic Research

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Publications
  • Teaching
  • Python
  • About Me
You are here: Home / academia / Let’s Ban the One-Way Informational Meeting

Let’s Ban the One-Way Informational Meeting

October 17, 2014 by Gregory Saxton 6 Comments

8250849786_1a30b00faf_z

As I was sitting in a meeting today — bored out of my tree — my mind drifted to research (hey, it’s what I do). It occurred to me that social media researchers have a decent message framework that can also be used for categorizing different types of meetings according to the intended audience role. And that the reason I hate am not particularly fond of meetings is that most employ the least effective audience role.

Let me explain. Social media researchers, myself included, have begun to classify social media messages based on whether the message is aimed at one-way information, two-way dialogue and relationship-building, or mobilization and action (for a review, see Lovejoy & Saxton, 2012).[1] This same framework can be applied to meetings. In one-way informational meeetings, the audience members is intended to be a passive recipient of information. In two-way communication meetings, there is a real exchange of ideas and the audience member serves as conversant and generator of ideas. And lastly, there are action-oriented meetings, or meetings where the aim is to get something done, with the audience member put in the role of “doer.”

Most meetings are boring ineffective because they are devoted to the one-way delivery of information from a presenter to a passive audience. Often the inefficacy of these meetings is compounded by ineffective use of Power Point, but that’s another matter. Here’s the thing: Meetings where one person simply gives us a “report” are boring. They are ineffectual. Ineffective. Lacking in efficacy. You should not do them. They are a waste of time. They should be banished from the face of the planet. Those violating this rule should be (figuratively) keel-hauled.

The point is, information can be conveyed much more efficiently in any number of different ways. Meetings should be reserved for building relationships, for sharing ideas, for working through important organizational issues. In short, meetings should be used as a tool for helping move an organization toward meeting its strategic aims. They should, in other words, conform to a mobilizational action model or a two-way dialogic model. So before you schedule a meeting, ask yourself this: “Are we going to discuss or do anything that will help us meet our mission?” If the answer is “no,” then cancel the meeting or reconsider your agenda. Let’s ban the one-way informational meeting.

References

  • [DOI] Lovejoy, K., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 17, 337-353. [BibTeX] [Abstract] [PDF]

    The rapid diffusion of `microblogging’ services such as Twitter is ushering in a new era of possibilities for organizations to communicate with and engage their core stakeholders and the general public. To enhance understanding of the communicative functions microblogging serves for organizations, this study examines the Twitter utilization practices of the 100 largest nonprofit organizations in the United States. The analysis reveals there are three key functions of microblogging updates –- `information,’ `community,’ and `action.’ Though the informational use of microblogging is extensive, nonprofit organizations are better at using Twitter to strategically engage their stakeholders via dialogic and community-building practices than they have been with traditional websites. The adoption of social media appears to have engendered new paradigms of public engagement.

    @article{Lovejoy2012,
    Abstract = {The rapid diffusion of `microblogging' services such as Twitter is ushering in a new era of possibilities for organizations to communicate with and engage their core stakeholders and the general public. To enhance understanding of the communicative functions microblogging serves for organizations, this study examines the Twitter utilization practices of the 100 largest nonprofit organizations in the United States. The analysis reveals there are three key functions of microblogging updates --- `information,' `community,' and `action.' Though the informational use of microblogging is extensive, nonprofit organizations are better at using Twitter to strategically engage their stakeholders via dialogic and community-building practices than they have been with traditional websites. The adoption of social media appears to have engendered new paradigms of public engagement.},
    Author = {Lovejoy, Kristen and Saxton, Gregory D.},
    Date-Added = {2014-02-14 00:40:05 +0000},
    Date-Modified = {2014-02-14 17:04:45 +0000},
    Doi = {10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x},
    Journal = {Journal of {C}omputer‐{M}ediated {C}ommunication},
    Pages = {337-353},
    Title = {Information, Community, and Action: {H}ow Nonprofit Organizations Use Social Media},
    Url = {http://ssrn.com/abstract=2039815},
    Volume = {17},
    Year = {2012},
    Bdsk-Url-1 = {http://ssrn.com/abstract=2039815},
    Bdsk-Url-2 = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x}}

Share Button
image_pdfimage_print

Filed Under: academia Tagged With: academia

Recent Posts

  • Making a Contribution in Accounting Research, Part IV: Mapping the Conceptual Relationships in Nonprofit Accounting Articles
  • Making a Contribution in Accounting Research, Part II: Focus on Nonprofit Accounting
  • Making a Contribution in Accounting Research, Part I: Types of Contributions
  • Making a Contribution in Accounting Research, Part III: Relationships in Top Nonprofit Accounting Articles
  • Quest for Attention: Nonprofit Advocacy in a Social Media Age

Featured Posts

Python Data Analytics Tutorials

The bulk of my research involves some degree of 'Big Data' … [Read More...]

Downloading Tweets, Take III – MongoDB

In this tutorial I walk you through how to use Python and … [Read More...]

Does Twitter Matter?

Twitter is not the Gutenberg Press. The 'Big Data' … [Read More...]

Archives

  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • July 2020
  • January 2019
  • October 2018
  • July 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014

E-mail sign-up

Every time I post something new to my blog, receive it free by email.

No spam.

Contact Information

Gregory D. Saxton
Schulich School of Business
York University
Toronto, ON
gsaxton@yorku.ca

Recent Posts

  • Making a Contribution in Accounting Research, Part IV: Mapping the Conceptual Relationships in Nonprofit Accounting Articles
  • Making a Contribution in Accounting Research, Part II: Focus on Nonprofit Accounting
  • Making a Contribution in Accounting Research, Part I: Types of Contributions
  • Making a Contribution in Accounting Research, Part III: Relationships in Top Nonprofit Accounting Articles
  • Quest for Attention: Nonprofit Advocacy in a Social Media Age

Tag Cloud

academia academic research AccountingAnalytics arnova14 Big Data conference Data Analytics Database hashtags ica iPython MongoDB nonprofits PANDAS PhD_studies Programming python replication research social media socialmedia tutorial Twitter

Copyright © 2021 · Metro Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in